We've seen plenty of aftermarket headsets which alter the head angle or the reach, but this product from EMRG (pronounced “emerge”) aims to do something quite different.
Reach-adjust headsets move the headset bearings forwards or backwards within the head tube, therefore moving the steering assembly forwards or backwards with them; angle sets move one bearing forwards and one back inside the headtube, thereby changing the angle of the steering assembly. (The steering assembly is everything that rotates as you steer the handlebars: the front wheel, fork and cockpit). In either case, the steerer tube rotates concentrically about the steering axis, which is the line drawn through the centre of both bearings.
By contrast, EMRG's "Virtual Pivot Headset" keeps the headset bearings in the normal place, but the steerer tube is mounted in a pair of eccentric races. That means the steering assembly is offset from the steering axis by 4 mm, and so it rotates about the steering axis which is no longer at the centre of the steerer tube. This effectively changes the offset of your fork by +/- 4mm. So if you had a 44 mm offset fork (the most common size these days), this headset would allow you to run either 40 mm or 48 mm of steering offset, by moving the front axle closer to the steering axis or further away from it.
Why would you want to do that? Well, a shorter fork offset results in more trail, which is the distance between the steering axis and the tire contact patch. More trail generally makes for heavier, slower steering, but the front wheel is less likely to be knocked off-line in technical terrain. Increasing the fork offset does the opposite, making for lighter but twitchier steering.
It's worth noting that in this case, because the whole settering assembly is moved forwards or backwards, changing the fork offset will also change the effective stem length by the same amount. Having done several back-to-back tests comparing 42 mm and 51 mm offset forks, I'd say that changing the effective stem length by 4 mm is probably more noticeable than changing the offset on a modern bike. Still, it's cool to see new ideas and new ways for racers, bike nerds and puzzlers to tweak their setup.
The headset is compatible with 1-1/8" steerer tubes (DH forks) and tapered 1.5" to 1-1/8" steerers, as well as most head tube sizes. It costs €159.
For more information, check out
EMRG.bike.
I'm no math genius, but a headset offset is not the same as fork offset.
The only way it could be a virtual offset is if the cups move with the steerer, so that appears to be what they've done, kinda' complicated, easier to just to get a different fork.
@gtill9000 idk, people were making a really big deal about fork offset a couple years ago. I don't think I'd buy one but it would be kinda cool to try out the offest thing without spending the money on a whole extra fork. Seems like you'd also want to swap stems to compensate for the the distance between bearing center and steer tube center though?
Headset offset, done this way, actually is the same as fork offset, with the exception that this also offsets the stem. Changing offset in most (all? Does anyone use different lowers for offsets?) forks is done with the crown, which moves the legs, lowers, and thus the axle closer or further from the steering axis. This moves the entire fork, including the steerer, relative to the steering axis. Same thing.
Do I understand that correctly?
The stem stays the same, but the reach of the bike decreases by 4
Back sweep just makes effective stem length shorter (as the midpoint between your hands is closer to the axle than the stem’s length).
Nothing here changes the reach. The center of the frame’s headset mount is still the center of the rotating axle or axis or what you want to call it.
@alexbn921:.nope, effective stem length changes, and effective reach, too. But frame reach doesn't change: the steering axis remains where it was.
Now, this here EMRG 'fork offset altering headset' makes it possible to take an older 51 mm offset fork and decrease it to a 51-4=47 mm offset fork. This would make it better in my eyes. ...also decreasing whichever stem length used by 4 mm, for example 50 to 46 or 40 to 36 mm.
This here EMRG would also make it possible to decrease a 44 offset fork to a 40 mm offset fork. It could be interesting to try. At the same time, it would change stem length, so using a 50 stem it would become 46 mm.
Important though, is that this does not make it possible to change any other parameter at the same time, for example if wanting to slacken the head tube by 1 or 2°, normally done with an angle set.
Good to note as well, is that for a ZS44/56 bike frame, this here EMRG headset has external cups both top and bottom, changing things if currently able to use a headset with zero stack top and bottom.
--> Only a bike frame with ZS 56/56 coupled with a straight 1 1/8" fork steerer, typical that of a double-crown fork, would be able to use zero stack cups top and bottom. Transition frames, I believe, are ZS56/56 and could with a double-crown fork be used with this 'EMRG offset changing headset' without external cups, whatever this is worth.
---> And, a double-crown fork on a ZS44/56 bike with this EMRG would also retain a ZS internal cup on the bottom, but getting into the double-crown world has a whole other world of benefits and drawbacks...
Most will use it to reduce offset, so from a 51mm 29er fork to 47mm - still more than the 44mm alternative fox offers for example.
It will be a subtle difference, no fantastic / horrible scenarios.
Degrees Fahrenheit.
Got it .